home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.umbc.edu!not-for-mail
- From: schlein@umbc.edu (Jonas J. Schlein)
- Newsgroups: comp.std.c
- Subject: noalias in C9X?
- Date: 4 Jan 1996 00:37:24 -0500
- Organization: University of Maryland Baltimore County
- Message-ID: <4cfp2k$4gt@umbc9.umbc.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: f-umbc9.umbc.edu
- NNTP-Posting-User: schlein
-
- Now that the CLC FAQ is in print and I have been able to (finally!) obtain
- a copy, I have been reading it over carefully.
-
- In question 11.28 the 'noalias' qualifier was mentioned as being introduced
- too late to make it into the standard. Also difficulty in giving it well
- defined behavior stood as an obstacle.
-
- My question is whether or not this, or something similar will be in
- a future standard?
-
- Thanks in advance...
- --
- "If it wasn't for C, we would be using BASI, PASAL, and OBOL."
-
- Jonas J. Schlein (schlein@gl.umbc.edu)
-